Ambassador 模式架构
Architecture
Ambassador 模式架构图,本地代理边车处理身份验证头注入、熔断、重试逻辑和对外部第三方 API 出站请求的指标收集。该模板模拟 Ambassador 模式,与应用一起运行的辅助服务卸载外部通信的横切关注点。适合与需要弹性包装器的不可靠第三方服务集成的团队。
完整 FlowZap 代码
Application { # Application Container
n1: circle label:"Outbound Request"
n2: rectangle label:"Application Code"
n3: rectangle label:"Ambassador Proxy"
n4: rectangle label:"Receive Proxied Response"
n5: circle label:"End"
n1.handle(right) -> n2.handle(left)
n2.handle(right) -> n3.handle(left) [label="localhost:9000"]
n3.handle(bottom) -> AmbassadorLogic.n6.handle(top) [label="Intercept"]
n4.handle(right) -> n5.handle(left)
}
AmbassadorLogic { # Ambassador Logic
n6: rectangle label:"Add Auth Headers"
n7: rectangle label:"Apply Circuit Breaker"
n8: rectangle label:"Enable Retry Logic"
n9: rectangle label:"Collect Metrics"
n10: diamond label:"Circuit Open?"
n11: rectangle label:"Forward to External Service"
n12: rectangle label:"Return Cached Fallback"
n6.handle(right) -> n7.handle(left) [label="Bearer Token"]
n7.handle(right) -> n10.handle(left)
n10.handle(right) -> n8.handle(left) [label="Closed"]
n10.handle(bottom) -> n12.handle(top) [label="Open"]
n8.handle(right) -> n11.handle(left) [label="With Retry"]
n11.handle(bottom) -> ExternalService.n13.handle(top) [label="HTTPS"]
n12.handle(top) -> Application.n4.handle(bottom) [label="Fallback"]
n11.handle(right) -> n9.handle(left) [label="Latency"]
}
ExternalService { # External API
n13: rectangle label:"Third-Party API"
n14: rectangle label:"Process Request"
n15: rectangle label:"Return Response"
n13.handle(right) -> n14.handle(left)
n14.handle(right) -> n15.handle(left)
n15.handle(top) -> Application.n4.handle(bottom) [label="Response"]
n15.handle(top) -> AmbassadorLogic.n9.handle(bottom) [label="Metrics"]
}
为什么需要这个工作流?
Integrating with external third-party APIs often requires adding authentication headers, retry logic, circuit breaking, and metrics collection—cluttering application code with infrastructure concerns. The ambassador pattern offloads these cross-cutting concerns to a local proxy sidecar, keeping application code focused on business logic.
工作原理
- Step 1: The application sends outbound requests to the ambassador proxy on localhost.
- Step 2: The ambassador injects authentication headers (Bearer tokens) for the external API.
- Step 3: Circuit breaker logic prevents requests to known-failing external services.
- Step 4: Retry logic with exponential backoff handles transient failures automatically.
- Step 5: The request is forwarded to the external third-party API over HTTPS.
- Step 6: Metrics (latency, error rates) are collected for monitoring and alerting.
替代方案
Embedding resilience logic in application code creates language-specific maintenance burden. API management platforms handle some concerns but add latency. This template shows the ambassador sidecar approach for external API integration.
Key Facts
| Template Name | Ambassador 模式架构 |
| Category | Architecture |
| Steps | 6 workflow steps |
| Format | FlowZap Code (.fz file) |
相关模板
微服务 API 网关架构
Architecture
微服务 API 网关架构图,展示请求路由、JWT 身份验证、速率限制、服务发现以及跨分布式后端服务的响应聚合。该模板模拟微服务生态系统中所有客户端流量的入口点,在请求到达内部服务之前执行安全策略。适合设计具有集中式横切关注点的可扩展 API 基础设施的平台工程师。
微服务每服务独立数据库架构
Architecture
每服务独立数据库架构图,每个微服务拥有其专用数据存储,通过 Kafka 进行事件驱动同步以实现跨服务数据一致性。该模板展示了微服务数据隔离的核心原则,展示 PostgreSQL 和 MongoDB 如何在多语言持久化策略中共存。对于在保持最终一致性的同时强制服务自治的架构师至关重要。
按业务能力分解微服务架构
Architecture
按业务能力组织的微服务分解架构图:身份认证、产品目录、定价和订单履行,每个都有独立的数据存储和 API。该模板展示如何将单体应用拆分为与业务领域对齐的服务,使用 Backend-for-Frontend (BFF) 模式进行客户端特定的聚合。适合规划领域驱动微服务边界的架构师。
微服务绞杀者模式迁移架构
Architecture
绞杀者模式迁移架构图,展示使用路由层在新旧系统之间分流流量,逐步用新微服务替换遗留单体应用。该模板模拟经过验证的迁移策略,新功能作为微服务构建,遗留端点逐步退役。对于在不进行高风险大爆炸重写的情况下现代化遗留系统的团队至关重要。